Why Casino Royale is always better than no time to die (and why it isn’t)



Everyone loves a good spy movie, and the James Bond movies definitely scratch that itch. However, there are many Bond films out there and they have changed over the years. Now we have a new trilogy with Daniel Craig that definitely divides the opinions of hardcore fans. The first in the trilogy is Casino Royale, while the last is No Time To Die, but which one is better?

Since this is Daniel Craig’s last James Bond role, the character’s progression has been truly notable since the 2006 Casino Royale. And with fifteen years of development, Bond’s character has undergone various changes in his personality and traits. It all had to do with the influence of the supporting characters (Vesper, Lynd, Swann, Q, etc.), and since Bond is now done for good, it’s up to the evaluation to see the differences between the very beginning. and the end. Let’s get started.

A New Look at Bond in Casino Royale

Daniel Craig’s first James Bond film gave us a better understanding of the character. They revealed how Bond got his double 0 score, and he managed to stay true to the first Casino Royale ’60s film, as well as the 1953 book. And even 15 years later, this film remains an unequivocal high point of the franchise.

What they enhanced was Bond’s very character adding a bit of physics and vulnerability to him, and showed how betrayal and heartbreak created this character who was a bit misogynistic in the past. Craig’s Casino Royale is an adaptation of Ian Fleming’s first Bond novel and takes Boden back to his roots and lets us discover him with a new appreciation for the man behind the myth.

Casino Royale nailed the casting

Casino Royale delivered a serious and more grounded reinvention of the beloved character. Daniel Craig definitely inhabited the role with a playful charm and sullen intensity that no one else could have predicted. He described Bond as a character a little more flawed than a simple stoic and elegant spy.

The supporting cast was also well done and it certainly helped the film and Bond succeed. Eva Green delivered an electric performance as true femme fatale Vesper Lynd and she stole the show. Mads Mikkelsen and Jeffrey Wright also delivered something amazing and greatly supported Craig and Green as their villainous counterparts in The Cipher and CIA Agent Felix Leiter.

The entire cast did an amazing job as this was one of the best cast of recent movies. Not to mention an abundance of high octane action sequences, suspense and the inevitable high stakes poker. The poker scene in this movie was so inspiring that many fans decided to try out their skills in poker and other casino games, playing their own Bond character. You can easily find out more about these games on the SuperSeven Blog and see what it would be like to be the legendary James Bond.

More emotions in no time

In the final sequel to the trilogy, Craig’s Bond continues to develop and he started off as the stoic type. He didn’t want anyone to see his emotions and the only person he opened up to was Vesper. But when M’s life was threatened, Bond became more open with his emotions. In addition, he no longer suppresses his emotions, which is a real development of character.

Another good thing about No Time To Die is seeing Bond being able to evolve and mature. Bond has spent the last four films mourning Vesper, but ultimately, in No Time to Die, he was able to move on from her with Madeleine.

Moreover, he also made peace with the influence of Blofeld on his life. And while Casino Royale has Leap on his shoulder with his need to prove he’s the ultimate spy and Vesper’s betrayal, in No Time to Die, he didn’t let any of those things affect him.

No time to waste in no time to die

We’re used to seeing Bond go up against bad guys. Even in Casino Royale, Bond and Le Chiffre have a personal antagonism – Bond spends a lot of time making fun of Le Chiffre. However, Raoul Silva’s death changed Bond’s behavior and he chose to simply kill him with a knife behind his back. So, Bond decides to waste less time torturing and his final act was to shoot Safin without any of his threats in this final stretch of the trilogy.

Additionally, Bond redefined his fighting style. In Casino Royale, he stood out for his speed and agility. But through time and the sequels, it was all about showing how Bond got older, which changed his skills in combat. In no time to die, we see it become slower but more deadly. He did not engage in any close combat and in fact preferred firearms to take down his targets quickly without wasting time and energy. His scrum also slowed down and he relied on his partners and teamwork.

James Bond is definitely the most beloved spy of all time, and in both of these films he is seen progressing. He’s more mature, more emotional, and Casino Royale and No Time To Die are perfect representations of this character developing and being more human.

Featured Image Credit: 007



Comments are closed.