Pierce Brosnan was fired by Eon after die another daybut if Daniel Craig had not replaced him in Casino Royale, things would have been very different. Brosnan served as Agent 007, James Bond for a total of four films: golden eye, tomorrow never dies, The world is not enoughand die another day. However, had die another day better received, the actor may well have stuck around for a fifth Bond film, completely changing the course of the series forever.
Brosnan began his Bond career in Martin Campbell’s golden eye, a new take on the series often hailed as a classic Bond adventure. However, Brosnan’s last Bond film, die another daywas derided by critics for its silly plot, with frequent comparisons to the Austin Powers series. It saw producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael Wilson fire Brosnan while he was filming another project in the Bahamas (via digital spy) to take the franchise in a new direction with the first blonde James Bond, Daniel Craig. The series then rebooted Bond for the first time, after Craig’s James got his 007 rank and license to kill in an adaptation of Ian Fleming’s debut novel, Casino Royale.
If Pierce Brosnan had been allowed to stay as James Bond, Casino Royale could have been completely different or even a totally different project. Brosnan had no indication of leaving the franchise and die another day certainly didn’t feel like a final film for the actor. As such, Casino Royale probably would have followed a similar format to Brosnan’s other Bond films, with a slightly lighter tone. After that, Brosnan may even have overtaken Sean Connery and Roger Moore in terms of Bond film count, as the actor has shown no signs of slowing down at the age of 49.
Casino Royale probably wouldn’t have been a reboot with Pierce Brosnan
Casino Royale was only a soft reboot, as it included elements from previous Bond films, including Judi Dench as MI6 boss M. However, no other supporting characters returned to accompany Daniel Craig’s first mission as Bond in this film or Quantum of Comfort. Sam Mendes eventually brought back icons like Miss Moneypenny and Q, recasting them with Naomie Harris and Ben Whishaw respectively in celestial fall. However, it probably would have been completely different if Brosnan had stayed on as James Bond, as it wouldn’t have made sense for him to interact with new versions of the characters. So even if Bond 21 was still Casino Royaleit almost certainly would have featured Samantha Bond’s Moneypenny and John Cleese’s Q, returning from Brosnan’s previous films alongside M and Bond himself.
The plot of Craig’s Bond being a brand new, inexperienced 00 agent would have been dropped, as it wouldn’t make sense with Brosnan at the helm once again. Not only did Brosnan star in four Bond films, golden eye had even shown him as a more junior agent in a flashback, when he was on a mission with 006, Alec Trevelyan (Sean Bean). Agent 00’s new plot point was clearly Eon trying to wipe the slate clean somewhat and let Daniel Craig portray a more reckless young Bond who just wouldn’t have worked with Pierce Brosnan as 007.
Pierce Brosnan’s Fifth Bond Movie May Not Even Be A Casino Royale Remake
Casino Royale was adapted for the screen in 1967, but not by Eon. As such, the film is something of a remake, but is a more direct adaptation of Fleming’s first novel. While it was still possible that Brosnan’s fifth Bond film could have been Casino Royale, this seems unlikely as Eon apparently used Fleming’s debut novel as a basis to reinforce that this was a fresh start for the character, taking things right back to James Bond’s first adventure. Whereas Casino Royale would have worked very well with Brosnan in the lead role and without the plot point of the young agent it seems unlikely that the filmmakers would have gone for such a basic spy story after the ridicule of die another day.
As such, viewers of Bond 21 probably could have expected something more similar to tomorrow never dies Where golden eye: Link-up films that take elements of Fleming’s source material without directly adapting the stories. While it’s unclear what, if anything, was planned for Pierce Brosnan’s fifth Bond film before Wilson and Broccoli decided to reboot the series with Craig, his next film would likely have been consistent with the last four. as well as the full cast, including Moneypenny, Q and M. It was highly unusual to see a Bond film without the three supporting characters, so it seems likely they would have returned if the film was Casino Royale or something completely new like Quantum of Solace, Skyfall and SPECTRUM.
Martin Campbell Would Have Still Created a James Bond Masterpiece
Whether golden eye and Casino Royale director Martin Campbell stayed on board with Brosnan and 007 in Bond 21, there’s no doubt the film would always have been a critically acclaimed masterpiece, much like his two Bond films. Campbell is famous for having a perfect track record in terms of Bond movies, like Casino Royale currently has 94% on Rotten Tomatoes while golden eye maintains a very respectable 80%. Both films are often considered among the best of the Bond series, and it’s easy to see why. Whether it be Casino Royale or another Bond movie, Bond 21 would still have been a masterpiece, provided Campbell was still on board.
If Bond 21 was Pierce Brosnan’s last Bond film, it would have also allowed him to leave the series on a high. Not only might the actor decide to leave rather than be fired, but his latest Bond movie would be far better known than die another day. Thanks to its ridiculous plot involving a race-changing machine, an invisible car, and a giant space laser, die another day is consistently counted as one of the worst Bond films, maintaining a low score of 56% on Rotten Tomatoes. Reuniting Campbell and Brosnan would also have been poetic, as the two began their Bond careers with golden eye. Unfortunately, Brosnan was destined to conclude his Bond career with die another daybut if he had stayed Casino Royaleit could have been a completely different film while still being a solid entry in the James Bond franchise.